<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Energy Efficiency Works &#187; Press Room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energyefficiencyworks.org/category/press-room/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Energy Dept. ponies up $120M more for building energy efficiency</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/energy-dept-ponies-up-120m-more-for-building-energy-efficiency</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/energy-dept-ponies-up-120m-more-for-building-energy-efficiency#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that it has earmarked $120 million to be divided among about 120 organizations working to weatherize buildings for greater energy efficiency. The grant money will be distributed under the banner of its Weatherization Assistance Program, which has already retrofitted thousands of homes across the country.
 Reuters 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Energy announced today that it has earmarked $120 million to be divided among about 120 organizations working to weatherize buildings for greater energy efficiency. The grant money will be distributed under the banner of its Weatherization Assistance Program, which has already retrofitted thousands of homes across the country.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS403894488120100820"><em> Reuters </em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/energy-dept-ponies-up-120m-more-for-building-energy-efficiency/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mayor introduces ecofriendly bill</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/mayor-introduces-ecofriendly-bill</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/mayor-introduces-ecofriendly-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Francisco already has some of the nation&#8217;s toughest green building standards for new construction.  On Tuesday, Mayor Gavin Newsom introduced legislation aimed at making existing commercial buildings as ecofriendly as possible.  The legislation submitted to the Board of Supervisors would require the owners of large commercial buildings to conduct an energy-efficiency audit every five<a class="more" href="http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/mayor-introduces-ecofriendly-bill">Read the full article</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Francisco already has some of the nation&#8217;s toughest green building standards for new construction.  On Tuesday, Mayor Gavin Newsom<strong> </strong>introduced legislation aimed at making existing commercial buildings as ecofriendly as possible.  The legislation submitted to the Board of Supervisors would require the owners of large commercial buildings to conduct an energy-efficiency audit every five years and to supply annual updates &#8211; all of which would be available in a public database.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/08/10/BA5I1ES12J.DTL">San Francisco Chronicle</a></em></p>
<div><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/08/10/BA5I1ES12J.DTL#ixzz0wQQyJ934"><br />
</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/mayor-introduces-ecofriendly-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missoula City Council gives green light to $1 million in energy conservation work</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/missoula-city-council-gives-green-light-to-1-million-in-energy-conservation-work</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/missoula-city-council-gives-green-light-to-1-million-in-energy-conservation-work#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Missoula City Council this week unanimously gave a green light to 19 energy conservation upgrades worth some $1.37 million.  Last year, the city of Missoula contracted with Johnson Controls to conduct an energy audit and recommend conservation upgrades. The company identified 43 possible projects costing $7.8 million, according to a city memo.
The Missoulian
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Missoula City Council this week unanimously gave a green light to 19 energy conservation upgrades worth some $1.37 million.  Last year, the city of Missoula contracted with Johnson Controls to conduct an energy audit and recommend conservation upgrades. The company identified 43 possible projects costing $7.8 million, according to a city memo.</p>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_c033c598-a4ff-11df-8c16-001cc4c002e0.html"><em>The Missoulian</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/missoula-city-council-gives-green-light-to-1-million-in-energy-conservation-work/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Approves Higher Energy Efficiency Goals</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/texas-approves-higher-energy-efficiency-goals</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/texas-approves-higher-energy-efficiency-goals#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Aug. 12, the Public Utility Commission plans to adopt stricter requirements for energy efficiency in Texas.  The new rules would require that utilities offset 25 percent of growth in electricity demand with efficiency measures by 2012, and 30 percent in 2013. The current requirement is 20 percent.
The Texas Tribune
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Aug. 12, the Public Utility Commission plans to adopt stricter requirements for energy efficiency in Texas.  The new rules would require that utilities offset 25 percent of growth in electricity demand with efficiency measures by 2012, and 30 percent in 2013. The current requirement is 20 percent.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.texastribune.org/texas-energy/energy/texas-approves-higher-energy-efficiency-goals/">The Texas Tribune</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/texas-approves-higher-energy-efficiency-goals/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona regulators approve rules for energy efficiency</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/arizona-regulators-approve-rules-for-energy-efficiency</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/arizona-regulators-approve-rules-for-energy-efficiency#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arizona regulators adopted a rule requiring the state&#8217;s electric utility companies to reduce the amount of power they sell by 22 percent by 2020. The policy is one of the most aggressive in the country and the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project estimates it will save ratepayers who implement energy-efficiency measures about $9 billion over the<a class="more" href="http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/arizona-regulators-approve-rules-for-energy-efficiency">Read the full article</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arizona regulators adopted a rule requiring the state&#8217;s electric utility companies to reduce the amount of power they sell by 22 percent by 2020. The policy is one of the most aggressive in the country and the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project estimates it will save ratepayers who implement energy-efficiency measures about $9 billion over the next decade.</p>
<p><a class="aligncenter" title="The Arizona Republic" href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/ahwatukee/articles/2010/07/27/20100727arizona-energy-efficiency-rules.html" target="_blank"><em>The Arizona Republic</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/arizona-regulators-approve-rules-for-energy-efficiency/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies, green groups push for utility efficiency mandate</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/companies-green-groups-push-for-utility-efficiency-mandate</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/companies-green-groups-push-for-utility-efficiency-mandate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fifty-seven businesses, environmental groups, and other clean energy advocates sent a letter to Senate leadership calling for an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard that would reduce energy use by 1 percent-per-year, ramping up  over time. The letter points out that no Senate bills currently come close to this standard, even it though it would save consumers<a class="more" href="http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/companies-green-groups-push-for-utility-efficiency-mandate">Read the full article</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifty-seven businesses, environmental groups, and other clean energy advocates sent a letter to Senate leadership calling for an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard that would reduce energy use by 1 percent-per-year, ramping up  over time. The letter points out that no Senate bills currently come close to this standard, even it though it would save consumers money and create hundreds of thousands of jobs.</p>
<p><a class="aligncenter" title="The Hill" href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/110095-companies-green-groups-push-for-utility-efficiency-mandate" target="_blank"><em>The Hill</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/companies-green-groups-push-for-utility-efficiency-mandate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program to test whether data motivates energy conservation</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/program-to-test-whether-data-motivates-energy-conservation</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/program-to-test-whether-data-motivates-energy-conservation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. is teaming up with energy efficiency company OPOWER to provide customers with bimonthly reports that show them how their energy use and habits compare to  other ratepayers who live in homes similar to their own. The measure is designed to encourage reduction in energy use and is merely a precursor<a class="more" href="http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/program-to-test-whether-data-motivates-energy-conservation">Read the full article</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. is teaming up with energy efficiency company OPOWER to provide customers with bimonthly reports that show them how their energy use and habits compare to  other ratepayers who live in homes similar to their own. The measure is designed to encourage reduction in energy use and is merely a precursor to an $835 million smart meter project the utility has in the works.</p>
<p><a class="aligncenter" title="The Baltimore Sun" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-bge-electric-bills-opower-20100718,0,2200738.story" target="_blank"><em>The Baltimore Sun</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/program-to-test-whether-data-motivates-energy-conservation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a National Energy-Efficiency Program Work in Texas?</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/can-a-national-energy-efficiency-program-work-in-texas</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/can-a-national-energy-efficiency-program-work-in-texas#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas Tribune reports that the PACE program, currently undergoing turmoil in Washington, has become quite popular in the Lone Star State. The popularity has been particularly focused in San Antonio, Austin and Houston.
The Texas Tribune
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Texas Tribune</em> reports that the PACE program, currently undergoing turmoil in Washington, has become quite popular in the Lone Star State. The popularity has been particularly focused in San Antonio, Austin and Houston.</p>
<p><a class="aligncenter" title="The Texas Tribune" href="http://www.texastribune.org/texas-energy/energy/can-a-national-energy-efficiency-program-work-in-t/" target="_blank"><em>The Texas Tribune</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/can-a-national-energy-efficiency-program-work-in-texas/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Businesses, Clean Energy Advocates Urge Reid, Senate to Pass Robust Energy Efficiency Resource Standard</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/press-releases/businesses-clean-energy-advocates-urge-reid-senate-to-pass-robust-energy-efficiency-resource-standard</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/press-releases/businesses-clean-energy-advocates-urge-reid-senate-to-pass-robust-energy-efficiency-resource-standard#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Groups send letter highlighting the need for an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard for utilities to create jobs, cut energy bills and reduce greenhouse gas emissions
 
 
WASHINGTON—In a letter sent to Sen. Harry Reid today, 57 business leaders, trade associations and environmental organizations call on the Senate to pass a strong Energy Efficiency Resource Standard<a class="more" href="http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/press-releases/businesses-clean-energy-advocates-urge-reid-senate-to-pass-robust-energy-efficiency-resource-standard">Read the full article</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Groups send letter highlighting the need for an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard for utilities to create jobs, cut energy bills and reduce greenhouse gas emissions</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>WASHINGTON—In a letter sent to Sen. Harry Reid today, 57 business leaders, trade associations and environmental organizations call on the Senate to pass a strong Energy Efficiency Resource Standard for utilities as a core measure in climate and energy legislation.</p>
<p>The letter, delivered to Capitol Hill on Wednesday, July 21, urges Congress to grab the “low-hanging fruit” of energy efficiency, which is the cheapest, fastest and cleanest way to meet growing energy demand.  The groups call for a common sense standard that would reduce energy usage by 1 percent per year, ramping up over time, calling such a standard critical to cutting carbon emissions and creating jobs.</p>
<p>A stand-alone Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) for utilities, which could be met by the establishment of customer programs and incentives to invest in efficiency upgrades, has the potential to create up to 900,000 new jobs. As a policy that drives energy efficiency investments, an EERS could save the country over $100 billion in energy costs by 2020, with individuals and businesses seeing energy bills drop by more than 30 percent.</p>
<p>“As the Senate works to assemble a comprehensive climate and energy bill to create clean energy jobs, reduce global warming pollution and respond to the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, we urge you to include a minimum Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) for utilities.  The most affordable alternative to continued use of carbon-intensive fossil fuels is energy efficiency,” the letter reads.</p>
<p>Existing Senate bills include efficiency provisions, but none come close to delivering 1 percent energy savings per year, which experts say is easily  achievable, with 20 states having at least the same standard. A series of analyses have shown that the existing proposals are leaving billions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of jobs on the table by not including stronger efficiency standards. Consensus is growing that energy efficiency is crucial to achieving energy independence, reducing greenhouse gas pollution, and promoting job growth in the United States. Senate legislation must include a strong EERS to ensure that the savings and jobs it entails are realized.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Full text of the letter:</strong></p>
<p>July 21, 2010</p>
<p>The Honorable Harry Reid, Majority Leader</p>
<p>United   States Senate</p>
<p>522 Hart Senate Office Building</p>
<p>Washington, DC 20510</p>
<p>Dear Majority Leader Reid:</p>
<p>As the Senate works to assemble a comprehensive climate and energy bill to create clean energy jobs, reduce global warming pollution and respond to the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, we urge you to include a minimum Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) for utilities.  The most affordable alternative to continued use of carbon-intensive fossil fuels is energy efficiency.  Utilities could meet the standard by establishing efficiency programs for their residential, commercial and industrial customers – providing incentives to those who invest in high efficiency heating and air-conditioning systems, lighting, appliances, insulation, windows, whole building retrofits, industrial processes, combined heat and power systems, and other measures.  We believe the standard should decrease usage by at least 1 percent per year in 2012, ramping up to higher savings levels by 2020.</p>
<p>While twenty states already require 1 percent or greater savings, in most of the country the savings remain largely untapped although they are available to utilities at a cost of less than 3 cents/kWh, much lower than the cost of generating and distributing power, according to a study by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE).</p>
<p>By requiring utilities to help their customers save energy, Congress will:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Create      hundreds of thousands of new jobs – </strong>Shifting energy dollars from one      of the least labor-intensive activities in the economy—operating power      plants—towards a set of extremely labor intensive activities—retrofitting      existing homes and office buildings and installing high efficiency      lighting, equipment and appliances in all of them—will directly create      hundreds of thousands of new jobs – up to 900,000, according to a July      2009 analysis by McKinsey &amp; Co.       Increasing investment in efficiency creates even more jobs      indirectly, as people begin to realize lower energy bills and invest these      savings in their local economies.        An ACEEE analysis of just the federal EERS estimates it will create      more than 100,000 jobs by 2020 and more than 240,000 jobs by 2030.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Lower      the national energy bill by $100 billion – </strong>The McKinsey      2009 analysis found that adopting policies to drive investment in all      cost-effective energy efficiency could reduce the nation’s energy      bill $1.2 trillion by 2020.       Individuals and businesses can reduce their energy bills by over 30      percent.  Even consumers who did not      participate in efficiency programs would benefit because lower overall      consumption reduces fuel prices as well as air and carbon pollution and      strain on the electric grid.  The      ACEEE analysis of just the federal EERS estimates net present value      savings of more than $100 billion, after considering both the energy bill      savings plus the cost to utilities and consumers of energy-saving      investments.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reduce      greenhouse gas emissions: </strong>A 1% per year      standard alone would avoid about 215 million metric tons (MMT) of carbon      dioxide in the year 2020 and 306 MMT in 2030, including savings from      existing state EERS that also could be used to meet a federal program.      These avoided emissions amount to approximately 9% of electric-sector 2005      emissions by 2020 and 13% by 2030.       As the annual savings target increases, these emissions reductions      will increase as well.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reduce the need      for new power plant and transmission line construction</strong> – The ACEEE      analysis estimates energy savings from a federal EERS of more than 370      billion kWh in 2030, and a reduction in required peak generating capacity      of about 119,000 MW.</li>
</ul>
<p>Several Senate bills contain energy efficiency provisions, but none comes close to delivering savings of 1 percent per year.  The American Power Act (APA, drafted by Senators Kerry and Lieberman) and the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act (S. 1733) include a 20 percent and 33 percent efficiency investment requirement for natural gas utility carbon allowances respectively, but none for electric utilities.  The American Clean Energy Leadership Act (ACELA, S. 1462) has a 15 percent by 2020 renewable electricity standard (RES) that allows up to about 27 percent of the standard to be met with energy efficiency.</p>
<p>A June 2010 ACEEE <a href="http://aceee.org/pubs/e103.htm">analysis</a> of the APA and ACELA utility efficiency provisions found that the APA allocations would save 0.2 quads of energy annually by 2020, but the ACELA RES would not achieve any additional energy savings because the requirement is below business-as-usual projections.  In comparison, a 1 percent per year EERS would save 2.4 quads annually in 2020 and 3.9 in 2030. The 2030 figure equals almost the annual energy use of the state of New York.</p>
<p>An EERS of at least 1 percent per year in 2012, ramping up to higher savings levels by 2020, is critical to driving energy efficiency investments in the U.S.  We urge you to include an EERS in comprehensive climate and energy legislation.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>A.O. Smith</p>
<p>Alliance to Save Energy</p>
<p>American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy</p>
<p>Aspen Skiing Company</p>
<p>Ben &amp; Jerry&#8217;s</p>
<p>Best Buy</p>
<p>Business for Innovative Climate and Energy Policy</p>
<p>Ceres</p>
<p>Citizens for Pennsylvania&#8217;s Future</p>
<p>Citizens Utility Board of Wisconsin</p>
<p>Clif Bar &amp; Company</p>
<p>Conservation Law Foundation</p>
<p>Conservation Services Group</p>
<p>Danfoss</p>
<p>eBay</p>
<p>Efficiency First</p>
<p>Eileen Fisher</p>
<p>ENE</p>
<p>Energy Future Coalition</p>
<p>Environment America</p>
<p>Environment and Energy Study Institute</p>
<p>Environmental Law and Policy Center</p>
<p>Fresh Energy</p>
<p>Gap Inc.</p>
<p>Interfaith Power and Light</p>
<p>Johnson Controls</p>
<p>Jones Lang LaSalle</p>
<p>Levi Strauss &amp; Co.</p>
<p>Lime Energy</p>
<p>National Association of Energy Service Companies</p>
<p>National Association of State Energy Officials</p>
<p>National Community Action Foundation</p>
<p>National Housing Trust</p>
<p>Natural Resources Defense Council</p>
<p>New Mexico Coalition for Clean Affordable Energy</p>
<p>Nike</p>
<p>Northeast Energy Efficiency Council</p>
<p>O Power</p>
<p>Ohio Environmental Council</p>
<p>Outdoor Industry Association</p>
<p>Pace Energy and Climate  Center</p>
<p>Recycled Energy Development</p>
<p>Serious Materials</p>
<p>Seventh Generation</p>
<p>Sierra Club</p>
<p>Southern  Alliance for Clean Energy</p>
<p>Southwest Energy Efficiency Project</p>
<p>Starbucks</p>
<p>Stonyfield Farm</p>
<p>Symantec</p>
<p>Target Corporation</p>
<p>The North Face</p>
<p>Timberland</p>
<p>US Fuel Cell Council</p>
<p>Utah Clean Energy</p>
<p>Warner Power Solutions LLC (NH)</p>
<p>Western Resource Advocates</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/press-releases/businesses-clean-energy-advocates-urge-reid-senate-to-pass-robust-energy-efficiency-resource-standard/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Empire State Building goes green, one window at a time</title>
		<link>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/empire-state-building-goes-green-one-window-at-a-time</link>
		<comments>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/empire-state-building-goes-green-one-window-at-a-time#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcarter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyefficiencyworks.org/?p=725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Empire State Building is undergoing a $13 million renovation to cut energy use by 38 percent and save roughly $4.4 million per year in energy costs. Among many upgrades, the building will be getting new windows and insulation in the effort to be more green.
USA Today
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Empire State Building is undergoing a $13 million renovation to cut energy use by 38 percent and save roughly $4.4 million per year in energy costs. Among many upgrades, the building will be getting new windows and insulation in the effort to be more green.</p>
<p><a class="aligncenter" title="USA Today" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/environment/2010-07-12-empire-state-building-windows-green_N.htm" target="_blank"><em>USA Today</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energyefficiencyworks.org/press-room/news/empire-state-building-goes-green-one-window-at-a-time/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
